As befits the shortest month of the year, this
evening’s Cleveland Orchestra program at Severance Hall, which featured guest conductor Alain Altinoglu and cellist Alisa Weilerstein, was about the briefest
I’ve ever encountered at a Classical music concert – just about an hour’s worth
of music. Whatever the program lacked in
length was made up for in variety and substance.
The program opened with Unsuk Chin’s Cello Concerto,
composed in 2009, featuring Weilerstein in the solo part.The work is scored for a large
orchestra, supplemented with piano and celeste.As with subito
con forza, which was performed by the orchestra two years ago, Chin seems
more interested in orchestration and sonic textures than with thematic development.Totally atonal, the work shows the continuing
influence of Chin’s teacher György Ligeti.Weilerstein, a
frequent and welcome guest in Cleveland, made
the most of Chin’s unorthodox writing, which included rasping and scraping – as
well as delivering some haunting lyricism in the third movement.Weilerstein played a short Bach work in a
major key as an encore.
The Richard Strauss works followed
intermission.Let’s put one matter front
and center: The Cleveland Orchestra has been considered one of the world’s
great orchestras for the music of Richard Strauss for nearly 70 years – going
back to the George Szell era.In fact,
the first recordings I ever heard of the tone poems featured in this evening’s
concert were with this orchestra led by Lorin Maazel – way back when I was a
teenager.The recording also featured
Strauss’s Death and Transfiguration which, even then, struck me as the greatest
of the three.
Altinoglu
started with Till
Eulenspiegel’s Merry Pranks, based on the 16th Century German
folk hero.As
the story goes, Till Eulenspiegel, who may or may not have been a real person,
was a prankster whose targets were often those in power, including clergy and
academics.Eventually, the authorities
caught up with the naughty prankster and, as reflected in the music, he paid
the ultimate price with a one-way trip to the gallows.The 16th Century was definitely a “tough
on crime” era.But the work’s coda,
where the merry theme returns, assures the audience that his spirit lives on.This is the kind of work which, if played “straight,”
will die.Altinoglu caught the work’s
humor and shifted moods effortlessly, helped by pin-point turns by the
orchestra.
The character of Don Juan is more familiar: a rebellious
Spanish libertine or, in modern psychobabble, a sex addict. He also has a gambling problem and kills the
father of one of his conquests. Dude’s
got issues. As with Till Eulenspiegel,
Don Juan dies for his sins – but in this case the death is self-inflicted. Dark stuff indeed. But the tone poem
starts off with a brash major key fanfare, because pursuing and obtaining sex
is fun – at least in moderation. The fact that Don Juan is
rebelling against an overly strict father is icing on the cake. Just don’t fall in love or things will get complicated. Again, Altinoglu’s conception was a model of phrasing, pacing, and
clarity. The Cleveland Orchestra proved
once again that it retains its crown as a great orchestra for this kind of
repertoire, and special mention must be made of Nathaniel Silberschlag’s horn
solo which featured the most unearthly legato I’ve ever heard from that
instrument.
Daniel and I just returned from a five-day
vacation in Mexico, our fourth time in that country together. February is an ideal time to go to Mexico,
especially if you live in a climate like those of us in northeast Ohio. Also, as Cancún is
known as a spring break destination, by going in February you’re avoiding the
spring breakers – although we saw our share of drunken Americans. We chose Cancún as
our primary destination partly because we hadn’t been there before but mainly
because it was served by nonstop flights from two carriers: United and
Frontier. We’ve only flown Frontier once
before, a trip to Las Vegas in 2017 where we encountered no difficulties and
the flight was like a party. Many
travelers seem to dislike Frontier Airlines.
I think part of the discomfort some feel with Frontier is the DIY aspect
of doing business with them. Everything
is done via the app or the automated kiosk at the airport – including tagging
your own checked baggage. Aside from a
bit of lagginess with the app, we had no issues and since we were flying
internationally, we had to interact with a ticketing agent – who was very nice
and helped us resolve a very minor issue.
We awakened at 4am Wednesday the 11th and
drove to the airport. After checking our
bag and showing the ticketing agent our passport, we made it through TSA with
enough time to grab a quick breakfast and buy some bottled water before going
to the gate. This worked out well for us
because food and beverages cost extra onboard.
Our flight to Cancún was uneventful, but people baffle me - Cancún is
not the place to bring babies or toddlers, yet our flight had plenty of
them. The plane itself, an Airbus A321neo, was clean and functioned well,
but the cabin was designed for efficiency more than comfort. The seat backs did not recline, did not have
touch screens, nor were there chargers on board. You get what you pay for. If you can fit these factors into your
expectations, Frontier will work fine for you.
Frontier is known for its unique plane livery and the animal tail for our flight
down was Chopper, the Great White Shark.
(Our return flight featured Mitch the Wolverine.)
Once we landed at Cancún
International Airport, we breezed through border control, got our luggage,
and took the ADO bus
to the hotel zone. The bus dropped us off at Plaza
la Fiesta, and we grabbed a quick lunch on our way to our hotel of choice,
the InterContinental
Presidente resort, an IHG hotel. After multiple travel experiences
with Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, and Raddison, I’ve concluded that IHG simply
offers the best value for the money. Our
hotel room on the 5th floor was comfortable without being ostentatious.
The resort had three restaurants and a host of amenities. It also had
beachfront access although Dan & I aren’t especially beach oriented.
After settling in, we explored the hotel zone and stopped at Mextreme restaurant for drinks and a
small dinner. Later that evening, we took a taxi to a gay club in
downtown Cancún which was nearly empty and where the music was deafeningly
loud. There was another gay club nearby but they had a $20 cover charge and
nothing was happening there aside from a drag show and karaoke. Cancún is not Puerto Vallarta. So, we
called the same taxi driver - who had given us his phone number - and he swung
by to return us to our hotel. This time his young son was in the
passenger seat and I showed him photos of the snow in Ohio.
Enjoying a bit of nightlife.
We awakened fairly early Thursday morning and
had a fine breakfast which included beef tips and chilaquiles in the hotel’s beachside
restaurant buffet. This was Dan’s birthday and we had an open day to follow our
whims. We took the R2 bus
(12 pesos, about 70 cents per rider) to La
Isla mall.
Truthfully, there wasn’t much there that you
couldn’t find in any US mall. But we did ride the Ferris wheel which offered some
excellent views of the hotel zone. Then we went to the local cinema and
saw “Send Help,” which was presented in English with subtitles in
Español. This was one of those fancy theaters where they bring drinks and
snacks to you.
I gained a bit of weight in Mexico.
Friday the 13th was a lucky day for us and
featured a trip to Yucatán
including stops at Chichen
Itza - which gave us a sense of the pre-Conquistador history of the area, a
buffet lunch at La
Casona in the small town of Valladolid, and
the cenote of Oxman.
An interesting thing we learned is that many residents of this area are of
Mayan ancestry and their Español is heavily peppered with Mayan Yucatec words
and phrases. The late lunch we had in Valladolid was so generous that we didn’t
have room for dinner, although we had a small snack with drinks before turning
in for the night.
Chichen Itza
After the long trip to Yucatán Friday,
we stayed close to Cancún’s
hotel zone Saturday. We did have one excursion
out to the bay where we were able to see the underwater
ecosystem in a glass bottomed vessel. From there we walked to the Mayan
Museum of Cancún, which has the ruins of a small Mayan
village. The museum itself does not appear to be in very good
shape. This is something we’ve noticed in Cancún: parts are modern,
parts are charmingly rustic, and parts are in serious disrepair. We
walked to Plaza la Fiesta that evening for dinner at Casa Tequila and
some shopping at the Mexican outlet where we saw an extremely drunk American
guy struggling to remain standing.
Daniel outside the Mayan Museum.
Sunday was our last full day here. We
spent two hours on the beach. The sand here is so white and fine - and
the water amazingly clear. Then we returned to Mextreme for lunch and
drinks before a final walk around Plaza la Fiesta. They say that Cancún
is not the “real” Mexico, but we had an enjoyable time. Still, our next
visit to Mexico will likely take us elsewhere - perhaps Zipolite
in Oaxaca, or Mexico
City.
Our return trip to Mextreme.
We awakened early Monday morning for a quick
breakfast before checking out and heading to the airport. As we
waited in line to check our luggage, an announcement was made that Frontier’s
flight to Philadelphia had been canceled - eliciting a groan from some of those
in line. Meanwhile, an arrogant American bound for Cleveland was berating
the ticketing agent for something which was his own mistake. I always
feel the strong urge to speak up to bullies like this, but I held my
tongue. Soon we were checked in, through security, and at gate 53 in
terminal 4.
Our flight to Cleveland arrived early, but as
usual, US border patrol was a cluster of inefficiency. This has been a
sadly familiar experience, encountered every time we return to the United
States, whether at airports in Chicago, Dallas, Charlotte, or Cleveland.
A noteworthy contrast to our experiences with the efficient, friendly border
services we've witnessed in London, Barcelona, Puerto Vallarta, and
now Cancún. We retrieved Brownie from boarding around 5pm and were
soon home; unpacking, having dinner, relaxing, and planning our next trip.
One advantage of being old is that, as long as one maintains one's mental faculties, one has a long memory. I'm old enough to remember when the Mcdonald's on Mayfield Road in South Euclid (which has been rebuilt at least twice) featured signs on the outside proclaiming "CITY ORDINANCE - NO EATING IN CARS."
When I purchased my home on South Belvoir
Boulevard in 2008, there were four large oak trees on my property – two in the
front yard, one in the back yard, and one bordering my neighbor’s
property. Over the course of time, it became necessary to remove two of
these trees because of the danger they presented to our homes – in fact, a
large branch broke from the tree in the back yard and pierced through the roof
of my house’s extension, requiring an expensive repair. Removing large
trees is an expensive proposition. I can assure you that no homeowner
makes the decision lightly. The last thing we need is yet another
government commission looking over our shoulders.
City council was fine with this development at Queen Ann Court, which cut down numerous mature trees - which won't be replaced. But when it comes to removing trees on YOUR property, they want to make the decision for you.
My parents moved to South Euclid in
1971. From then until 1980 we lived on Queen Mary Drive. The
backyard of our house faced a wooded area. Since I moved back to South
Euclid in 2008, South Euclid has aggressively pursued developments of large
tracts of land, including Cutters Creek, Oakwood Commons, and more recently the
Queen Ann Court extension and now Trebisky Grove. These projects have and
will result in many large, mature trees being cut down – the vast majority of
which will never be replaced. The chief proponent of this new ordinance
has cited the environmental, infrastructural, and mental health benefits of
trees. I have no argument with that. My question is this: did the
proponent or any supporters of this ordinance support any of the developments
listed above? If so, then their advocacy of this ordinance reeks of
hypocrisy, because those developments cause far more damage to our environment
and strain on our local infrastructure than individual property owners will. I
find it bitterly ironic that City Council now wishes to regulate hard working, tax-paying
residents whose aim is merely to maintain their own property as they see
fit. South Euclid homeowners already struggle with some of the highest
property taxes in northeast Ohio. In the final analysis, it is the
property owner who is the best judge as to whether to maintain a tree on his
own property or remove it, not a city entity. South Euclid’s population
has dropped by some 27% since its peak in 1970. Don’t give those of us
who remain here another reason to leave.
This weekend’s Cleveland Orchestra concerts
featured guest conductor Antonello Manacorda along with the welcome return of
one of the greatest violinists of our time,Augustin
Hadelich. The orchestra is fresh from
its triumphant performances at Carnegie Hall, where they received rave
reviews.
The concert opened with Mendelssohn’s popular Violin
Concerto in E minor, Op. 64.This is a composition that balances Classical
rigor with Romantic expression, with all three movements linked via bridge
passages.Nearly every violinist of note
has performed and recorded this concerto. Having
heard Hadelich several times, I was looking forward to
his interpretation and was not disappointed.Violinist and orchestra delivered a performance which was intimate and
emphasized the work’s lyrical aspects.One highlight was in the central movement where Hadelich’s soaring lyricism
held the audience’s rapt attention.The
finale eschewed all shallow virtuosity while not sacrificing brilliance – it was
swift without sounding rushed.A
standing ovation was followed by an encore, a bluesy piece that was at once
familiar and unfamiliar.
Following intermission, Manacorda returned to
lead the orchestra in Schoenberg’s Chamber
Symphony No. 2.I’m
familiar with this work only through recordings and will confess that I have
not assimilated it enough to be able to comment on the performance except that the
work was delivered with an appropriate starkness.
The closing work was Schubert’s famed Symphony
No. 8 in B minor, D. 759, by Schubert – the so-called
“Unfinished” Symphony.Manacorda began
the work with stillness, as if it was arising from nothing, making this all too
familiar work a mystery once more.As
the introduction segued to the main theme, I was stuck once again by what an
unconventional opening movement this is.Manacorda is one of those rare musicians who understands the importance
of silence, and those moments of stillness served to make the movement’s turbulent
episodes all the more dramatic – even traumatic.For those who follow such matters, Manacorda
observed the repeat.The second movement
featured a relatively flowing tempo, with the melody in the high violins beautifully
floating over the strings.Again,
Manacorda took care to keep the orchestra at a true pianissimo when the score
indicated it.The concert ended in a
contemplative and serene mood – far removed from our stressful era.
I made a stock pot of Split
Pea Soup, enough to last a week, to counter the cold weather this weekend.
While the soup simmered I had some spare time,
so I decided to peruse the latest updates to Google Earth. There has been
quite a bit of development in South
Euclid, the suburb where I live. My family spent nine years
living on Queen Mary Drive, 1971-1980. There was a wooded area behind our
house. I vividly recall climbing very high up a tree in those woods one
day, only to have the branch I was on snap. Had I not grabbed branches to
slow my descent as I fell, I surely would have been seriously injured.
Now those trees are gone.
My childhood neighborhood as it appeared in
2023. My parents' former house with the reddish/brown roof is just above
the wooded area near the top of the photo. The wooded area along with the
large grassy area was sold by four homeowners on Trebisky Road (the north/south
street at the right of the photo) to a developer a few years ago. Queen
Ann Court dead-ended at the field.
The developer built 16 homes on the land he
acquired and here's the neighborhood as it now appears.
This is not the only development in this area
since my parents' house was sold. While we were there, a small farm owned
by the Whigam family stood just west of Trebisky Road. We would walk
there and buy corn on the cob and other produce when it was in season. In
the 1980s the family sold the farm and the land was developed into Daryl
Drive.
Here's another example of development, closer
to South Euclid's central core. Two empty lots are being developed into
townhouses. The upper lot is off of Francis Court, a one-way street that
connects Prasse Road with South Euclid's main drag, Mayfield Road. The
lower lot is off Sheffield Road, behind the post office. My sister Sarah
and I both have memories of the lower area. My sister was a pitcher on
the SELREC softball team, which played on this field. Years later, when I
was a high school student, my friends and I used to hang out here after hours
and sneak beers. One time we saw a police car in the distance and booked
it out of there. This was in 1984 so I assume the statute of limitations has
long since passed.
The large green area at the lower right is the
former SELREC ballfield. SELREC disbanded years ago and, as both South
Euclid and Lyndhurst have recreation centers along with plenty of parkland,
they had no use for the land.
The area in 2025, the open areas at the lower
right and upper center being prepared for construction. The projects are
expected to be complete by the end of 2026.
With all these developments, those
who live on the adjoining streets may feel inconvenienced. Their lives
are being disrupted by construction and once complete, the neighborhood will
have a higher density than before, to say nothing of the tree loss. But
the nature of our capitalist society is that whoever owns the land, whether an
individual or a developer, has the right to do what he wants with it - subject
to certain zoning limitations. Sure, the city could refuse to issue a
construction permit, but the city would then be sued and lose. Finally,
it must be pointed out that these developments will bring property and income
taxes to the city and the local schools - and given that the city's population
has dropped by about 27% since its peak in 1970, the city needs the income to
maintain infrastructure like roads - maintenance which doesn't get cheaper with
less population.
Contrasting symphonies from the 18th
and 20th centuries were on the program at this weekend’s Cleveland
Orchestra concerts led by music director Franz Welser-Möst.
First, a personal note: I was returning from a
quick trip to Florida yesterday and landed in Cleveland a mere three and a half
hours before the concert.I collected my
luggage, raced home, had dinner, and headed to Severance Hall in time for the
pre-concert lecture.What I had not
anticipated was that, despite wearing my noise-cancelling Air Pods during the
flights, my tinnitus was aggravated by the plane ride.Accordingly, I had some difficulty hearing
high frequencies during the concert.I
was also quite tired.Fortunately, the
concert was made available via the Adella app and I was able to watch again in
the morning before writing this review.
The concert began with one of my favorite
symphonies: Mozart’s
Symphony No. 41 in C major, K. 551 – the so-called
“Jupiter.”The nickname likely
originates with the work’s first publisher, who probably appended it to add to
the sales appeal for the work’s first publication a few years after Mozart’s
death.The composer created this work,
his last symphony, in a mere 16 days.It
was one of several works composed for a concert in 1788 which apparently never
took place, and it appears the work was never performed in Mozart’s
lifetime.The work has a propulsive
quality that anticipates what Beethoven would achieve early in the following
century.Welser-Möst’s approach balanced
this propulsiveness with Viennese elegance, favoring transparent textures and
tempos that were on the fast side, particularly in the work’s second movement.Welser-Möst injected some humor into the Menuetto’s
trio via some naughty rubato – maybe as a reminder that Mozart liked to
imbibe.
Dmitri Shostakovich’s Symphony
No. 11 in G minor, Op. 103 – titled “The Year 1905” by
the composer, could hardly be more different than Mozart’s. About the only thing the two works have in
common is that they both have four movements – but even this similarity is
deceptive as Mozart’s are distinctive while Shostakovich’s are interconnected. The latter composer’s work is double the
length of Mozart’s, uses a much larger orchestra, ends tragically, and
commemorates an event: theRussian
Revolution of 1905, which began with the massacre by Tsar Nicholas II’s guards
against workers who were delivering a petition protesting working
conditions.Further protests and strikes
followed, capped by a mutiny on the Battleship Potemkin, which forced the Tsar
to grudgingly accept some reforms which instituted a Constitutional
monarchy.The reforms were watered down
over the next twelve years, which led to the 1917 Revolution which gave the
world the Soviet Union – a new form of totalitarianism.
As for the Symphony itself, I first became
familiar with the work’s opening during Carl Sagan’s 1980
series, Cosmos, and later the soundtrack LP from the
series.The world premiere recording by
Stokowski was featured and I eventually bought the complete performance, which
imprinted itself in my mind as how the work went.In retrospect, as the work was new, neither
Stokowski nor the Houston Symphony Orchestra had fully assimilated it, and as
gorgeous as the 1958 sound was for the time, the interpretation as a whole was
sectionalized.Welser-Möst brought a
much more direct, cohesive approach to the sprawling work.The opening, set on the Square of the Tsar’s
Winter Palace, was atmospheric without being blurry, with chaste horn and
trumpet solos from Nathaniel Silberschlag and Michael Sachs.Throughout the movement, Welser-Möst kept the
dynamics muted, which made the crescendos of the second movement all the more
startling.This movement, which depicts
the brutal massacre of the 9th of January, was brilliantly brought
off; seldom have I heard the climax presented with such controlled, mechanistic
violence.The third movement, titled
Eternal Memory, was given a restrained performance, which is unusual in
Shostakovich interpretation; but it worked and set the stage for the devastating
finale.
Though this symphony was completed in the
Soviet Union of 1957, and the orchestra planned for this program months in
advance, my mind still made a connection to the events in this country over the
past year – particularly the recent murder of a Minneapolis woman at the hands
of an ICE officer this past week.In Lee
County Florida, a Donald Trump stronghold, I saw an anti-ICE protest on my way
to the airport, and there were larger protests all over the country.It seems that after the events of the last
few months – the increasingly disturbing revelations of the Epstein report; the
US intervention in Venezuela, which is entirely about oil; Trump’s threats
against Greenland; and the continued oppression of US citizens – that the
American people are finally awakening to the growing danger from within.
2025 was a year filled with challenges and
frustrations, yet with progress on the personal front.
January was a particularly difficult
month.First, the inauguration of Donald
Trump and his immediate implementation of Project 2025, which he said he knew
nothing of and would never put into action.As usual, Trump lied and while his lackeys help carry out his perverted
agenda, his supporters are either pleased with the turn of events or clueless
as to the implications, as those of us with historical knowledge witness the
rise of fascism in the United States.Second, our furnace died during a cold snap.This necessitated an expensive
replacement.The flip-side is that our natural
gas usage has dropped as the new heater is far more efficient.It’s also quieter.Third, we encountered some major plumbing
issues with our bathroom which required cutting into the living room ceiling to
address.This was not only disfiguring
to the ceiling, but it was also expensive.The good news is that the bathroom is now in the best condition it’s
been in since we bought our house in 2008.
The new bathtub drain as seen from the living room. The hole has since been patched.
Later in the year, we also decided on
something we’d been putting off for years: getting the ductwork cleaned.Having peered into the vents and cold air
returns, I knew they hadn’t been cleaned recently – it’s possible they were
never cleaned from the time the house was built in 1941. The before and after
difference was striking not just in the reduction of dust, but in furnace
efficiency.My sinuses appreciated the
change as well.
In February, Daniel and I were able to get
away from the toxic atmosphere of the United States for a
week in Spain, a country which survived nearly 40 years of
fascism. The trip was memorable enough
that it inspired a new composition.
Outside Sagrada Familia
In March, we returned to Daniel’s native Puerto Rico for
the first time since 2013. It was a
lovely trip and, in many ways, was like stepping back in time. We visited three shopping malls while there,
and all three places were busy and cheerful as if we’d suddenly found ourselves
in the 1980s.
A few snaps from Daniel's hometown, Aguadilla.
The food court of Plaza Las Américas Mall.
Our summer was fairly uneventful until
September, when we took a quick trip to Minnesota to spend a weekend at the Mall of America. As with the malls in Puerto Rico, the MoA was
active and entertaining – although we didn’t wind up buying much.
At the Museum of Illusions in the Mall of America.
November marked some interesting
developments. Trump and the GOP lost
nearly every election. Although it was
an off-year election and the impact was minimal, it’s a hopeful harbinger for
2026. While on vacation in Palm Springs, we
learned that the Supreme Court had rejected the appeal from that lunatic, Kim
Davis, meaning marriage equality is safe – at least
for now.
Some snaps from our time in Palm Springs.
Throughout the year, our dog Brownie
continued to mature and mellow.He still
has his zoomie moments and suffers from separation anxiety.But several trips to Camp Bow Wow have shown
him to be very well-socialized.
Our Brownie...
We attended too many concerts to recount
individually. The most interesting ones
are recounted in this blog. My purchases
of recorded music slowed to a crawl, in part thanks to the downsizing of Sony
Classical – a mere shadow of what was once a formidable label. I’ll have more thoughts on that in a future
post.
The greatest highlight of this year was making
contact, thanks to my brother Robert, with our uncle John – who, to the best of
my knowledge, I’d never met.John, a
former Naval officer, is the last surviving member from my father’s generation
of the family and has been a font of information on our history.He’s also an utterly charming gentleman and a
delight to spend time with.
With my brother Rob and our uncle John.
John in his Navy days.
He eventually rose to the rank of Lieutenant Commander
I continued the quest I began in earnest in
2021: getting myself into better shape.
After initially hitting a plateau, my weight is once again headed in the
right direction – downward. In November
my doctor gave me a clean bill of health: vitals, blood work, all where they
should be, although he advised me to try and lose those last 15 pounds.
Despite the good health news, I did something
this year I’ve wanted to get done for quite some time: making my final
arrangements.The helpful staff at Lakeview Cemetery made
everything easy: I’ll be cremated and my ashes placed there near my mother’s
grave.I’ve even purchased a headstone.
Planning one's own interment may seem heavy. But it was a pleasure to work with Lakeview Cemetery Memorial Advisor (and fellow Brush High School alum) Petronilla Ragland.
When I tell people about about making my final arrangements, I get the
oddest reactions. But I have a realistic
and unsentimental view of death: it’s the one thing that we all have in common.
From personal experience I know what
it’s like when a loved one dies unexpectedly.
The survivors find themselves having to make decisions about which they
may have varying degrees of confidence.
Did their loved one want this, or another alternative? Embalming or cremation? A formal funeral service or an informal
celebration of life? What kind of
burial? What kind of marker did they
want? What, if any, religious
symbols? Last, but not least: How to pay
for it? By making these decisions myself
and paying in advance, I’ve relieved my loved ones of the burden of making
those decisions, and of the cost.
Further, I have some control over the process while I’m alive – and the
legality of what I’ve stipulated will remain in force after I’m dead. Naturally, I hope the need to carry out these
plans won’t come for quite some time.
By day: Cubicle drone. By night: Husband, uncle, Classical music enthusiast, pianist, blogger, dogwalker, home renovator, Trekker, good trouble-maker.
All entries on this blog, with the exception of embedded content from other sources, are the intellectual property of Hank Drake. Any reproduction or reprinting without written permission is strictly prohibited.
A note about my reviews: I neither seek nor accept compensation (either monetary or in the form of tickets or complimentary products) for my reviews. Thus, the reader can be sure the reviews, wherever I cross-post them, reflect my honest opinion, and are not slanted in order to curry favor or peddle influence.
PLEASE NOTE: I've received a large number of spam responses to my blog. All comments are moderated. Spam, profanity, and hate-speech will be automatically deleted. Threats will be reported to the authorities. Anonymous comments are generally not posted. I publish my blog under my own name. Have some guts and do the same in your comments.