This Cleveland Orchestra season will feature more unfamiliar music than any other in its 103-year history. Last night’s concert, which consisted of works from the 19th, 20th, and 21st Centuries, demonstrated that unfamiliar isn’t necessarily “new”, and that there are numerous worthy works that are not met with immediate success.
Josef’s struggle
with mental illness, likely brought on by traumatic brain injuries, and his
early death meant that his success was overshadowed by that of his family
members. Dead before he was 43, he never
received the recognition in life his father or brothers did.
Strauss’
Heldengedichte (Heroic Poem), Op. 87, is a waltz inspired work with noble
moments that reminded me of Schubert’s Landler – numerous themes are presented
but not developed. Although not as memorable as his father’s “Radetsky March”
or his brother Johan II’s “Blue Danube Waltz”, it deserves to be better known.
The Sinfonia
No. 5 by American composer George Walker,
completed in 2018, represented the contemporary work on the program. Walker, a musical prodigy, was educated at
Oberlin Conservatory and the Curtis Institute of Music, where he studied with Rudolf Serkin. Walker should have become the United States’
first prominent African-American classical pianist – a recording of Brahms’
Second Piano Concerto with Walker attests to his technique and musicality. But the segregated country was not ready, and
he turned to composition – America would have to wait until the 1960s when André
Watts burst upon the scene for a Black pianist to be fully recognized.
What in
some ways could be seen as misfortune turned out to be fortuitous for music
lovers – because there has never been a shortage of good pianists since the
instrument was invented. As a composer, Walker
amassed a considerable output that is becoming increasingly known (the Cleveland
Orchestra will present two more works by Walker this season).
The
Sinfonia No. 5 is tightly constructed, highly dramatic, and cannily
orchestrated – picturesque moments abound during its 20-minute length. There are motifs and thematic elements which
could only be referred to as “American”.
Yet it is not a folksy work like some of Copland’s music, rather it is
acerbic and challenging. The compelling Sinfonia
includes spoken narrative, given a stirring rendition last night by Karamu House president Tony F. Sias.
Erich Wolfgang Korngold was born in Austria to a musical family in 1897. He was as much as a prodigy as Mozart and
Saint-Saëns, but today he is primarily known for his film scores,
which earned him two Academy Awards. As
someone who came to Classical music through the “back door” of film scores by
the likes of John Williams and Jerry Goldsmith, I have always felt that good
music is good music, and genre is secondary.
But while Williams is known as a film composer who has written some concert
music (including a fine Cello concerto championed by Yo-Yo Ma), Korngold was
primarily a concert composer who, for a decade, also composed film music.
The Symphony
in F-sharp major, premiered in Vienna in 1954, is beautifully structured, spectacularly
orchestrated, and contains numerous memorable tunes. The fact that some of these themes were used in
Korngold’s film scores is irrelevant – and they may have well been composed
long before the films were made and stored in the composer’s “icebox” for a
rainy day. Further, the Symphony is
emotionally moving, at least to me. Last
night’s concert was one of only three times I’ve been moved to tears by music,
in the work’s majestic and heartfelt Adagio.
Criticism
of Korngold’s post World War II works was nothing new. His later works were criticized for their
supposed “Hollywood” sound. But that raises
the question: since he helped to create that sound, would it not be more apropos
to refer to the “Hollywood” sound as the “Korngold” sound? His Violin Concerto, premiered by Jascha
Heifetz, was panned as “more corn than gold”.
But the work’s posthumous revival is a demonstration that critics in
search of a memorable phrase are not the ultimate arbiters of a composition’s
merit. Korngold’s misfortune was that he
composed broadly emotive music into an era which was rejecting that
aesthetic. This was the same mentality
that led to the replacement of much attractive but “old fashioned” architecture
with anonymous “modern” buildings – many of which have not stood the test of
time. Unlike Stravinsky, Korngold’s style
didn’t change over time. While one can
criticize Korngold’s lack of “evolution”, it can also be argued that some of
Stravinsky’s later works were gimmicky attempts to cash in on the latest fad –
and none of his post 1930 works have achieved the renown of the ballet scores
he composed prior to World War I. Sadly,
unlike Stravinsky, Korngold didn’t have the benefit of a long life – he died at
60 with no idea that a posthumous revival of his concert music would come to
pass.
The orchestra
under Franz Welser-Möst performed last night’s program with
their usual polish, as if they’d been playing these works for decades, and not
for the first time.