Sunday, July 22, 2012
Aurora
No comparison can be made between the weapons used by James Eagan Holmes and those envisioned by the nation's founders when they codified the Second Amendment.
There is nothing in the Constitution that justifies the posession of assault-type "AK" and "AR" weapons any more than there's justification for the posession of nuclear weapons. Need anyone be reminded that Holmes purchased these weapons legally on the open market?