It has
been over nine months since the people of South Euclid and Lyndhurst learned of
the Cuyahoga County Public Library’s plan to sell the Telling Mansion and move
to a new location on Green Road. While
many have spoken against the plan, the CCPL board has stated in no uncertain
terms that they are moving. South
Euclid’s government has very little power to affect the outcome.
Various
officials have claimed wide support for the move. I’m skeptical of that claim. I’ve discussed this issue far and wide, in
person and online. Aside from the CCPL
board members, I can count the number of people I’ve actually met who support
the move on one hand.
I remain opposed to the move for several reasons, most of which have nothing to do with the so-called “sentimental” value of the Telling Mansion. I feel the proposed location takes the branch too far from the geographical center of South Euclid-Lyndhurst and away from the main public transportation route – in all matters except wheelchair access, the Green Road site would be less accessible; further, the proposed site also removes three valuable properties from the public tax rolls. I’ve signed and promoted an online petition opposing the move. I’ve blogged and spoken against the move, as have numerous others. But the purpose of this post is not to debate the merits of the move – that has already been discussed to death.
I remain opposed to the move for several reasons, most of which have nothing to do with the so-called “sentimental” value of the Telling Mansion. I feel the proposed location takes the branch too far from the geographical center of South Euclid-Lyndhurst and away from the main public transportation route – in all matters except wheelchair access, the Green Road site would be less accessible; further, the proposed site also removes three valuable properties from the public tax rolls. I’ve signed and promoted an online petition opposing the move. I’ve blogged and spoken against the move, as have numerous others. But the purpose of this post is not to debate the merits of the move – that has already been discussed to death.
There are
two groups involved in the Library issue.
There is the Save the Mansion Library group, which is opposed to any
move by the Library – end of discussion.
They have been protesting on weekends outside the Library and originated
the change.org petition. The second group
is the Telling Mansion Preservation Organization – TeMPO (full disclosure, I am
a charter member and serve as the group’s Vice President).
One of
the reasons members of the community came together to form TeMPO is because the
other group’s efforts have not had any traction. Truth be told: “likes” on a facebook page and
change.org petitions do not carry any legal weight – they are of symbolic
importance only. (Let’s not even get
into the fact that Change.org, Inc. is a rather shady, for-profit company which
does not safeguard signatory information.
If you’ve noticed an increase in the number of spam e-mails in your
inbox after signing a change.org petition, there’s a reason.) Further, the CCPL is not subject to voter
referendum and the plans for the new Library cannot be vetoed by South Euclid’s
Planning Commission or by the City Council.
If either body tried to take such an action, the city would be subject
to a potentially costly lawsuit for which the taxpayers of South Euclid – and those
of South Euclid alone – would be on the hook.
Further, nothing is to be gained by demonizing the CCPL board, which has
been part of the tack taken by some of the other group’s more extreme members. Recently, the other group tried to get a
court order preventing the sale of the Telling Mansion. Within three hours, their request was
dismissed. Meanwhile, the CCPL board now
has two offers for the Mansion on the table.
(Over the weekend, I heard that the Save the Mansion Library group’s
legal help was paid for by one of the wealthiest families in Cleveland – a family
which could easily afford to buy the Telling Mansion, donate it to a
non-profit, and keep it opened for all to enjoy.) What was the other group’s response to the
dismissal? Continue pushing the online
petition and hold another weekend protest - which has accomplished nothing
concrete.
Einstein
referred to repeatedly trying the same methods and expecting different results as
a sign of insanity. There comes a time when one must prepare for the inevitable
and try to make the best of a bad situation.
Whether one agrees with or opposes the Library’s move, surely we can all
agree that the Telling Mansion, South Euclid’s most noteworthy architectural treasure,
must be saved and, preferably, remain open to the public.
As I’ve
stated before, people of good conscience can have differing points of view, and
even believe in different methods to achieve the same, or similar, goals. So, it’s disappointing when online
commentators feel the need to question the sincerity of TeMPO members and
accuse us of shilling for this-or-that South Euclid based politician, or try to
connect the Library issue with 2011’s Oakwood controversy. The fact is that TeMPO members come from all
over the political spectrum, from members of the Green Party to Democrats to
Republicans. Our treasurer ran against
the mayor in the 2011 election. TeMPO
has at least two members who are also in the Save the Mansion Library
group.
It’s easy
to sit at a keyboard and complain online.
It’s not so easy to roll up your sleeves, engage, come up with
solutions, and try to put those into action.
But it’s more rewarding.
No comments:
Post a Comment