As befits the shortest month of the year, this
evening’s Cleveland Orchestra program at Severance Hall, which featured guest conductor Alain Altinoglu and cellist Alisa Weilerstein, was about the briefest
I’ve ever encountered at a Classical music concert – just about an hour’s worth
of music. Whatever the program lacked in
length was made up for in variety and substance.
The program opened with Unsuk Chin’s Cello Concerto,
composed in 2009, featuring Weilerstein in the solo part.The work is scored for a large
orchestra, supplemented with piano and celeste.As with subito
con forza, which was performed by the orchestra two years ago, Chin seems
more interested in orchestration and sonic textures than with thematic development.Totally atonal, the work shows the continuing
influence of Chin’s teacher György Ligeti.Weilerstein, a
frequent and welcome guest in Cleveland, made
the most of Chin’s unorthodox writing, which included rasping and scraping – as
well as delivering some haunting lyricism in the third movement.Weilerstein played a short Bach work in a
major key as an encore.
The Richard Strauss works followed
intermission.Let’s put one matter front
and center: The Cleveland Orchestra has been considered one of the world’s
great orchestras for the music of Richard Strauss for nearly 70 years – going
back to the George Szell era.In fact,
the first recordings I ever heard of the tone poems featured in this evening’s
concert were with this orchestra led by Lorin Maazel – way back when I was a
teenager.The recording also featured
Strauss’s Death and Transfiguration which, even then, struck me as the greatest
of the three.
Altinoglu
started with Till
Eulenspiegel’s Merry Pranks, based on the 16th Century German
folk hero.As
the story goes, Till Eulenspiegel, who may or may not have been a real person,
was a prankster whose targets were often those in power, including clergy and
academics.Eventually, the authorities
caught up with the naughty prankster and, as reflected in the music, he paid
the ultimate price with a one-way trip to the gallows.The 16th Century was definitely a “tough
on crime” era.But the work’s coda,
where the merry theme returns, assures the audience that his spirit lives on.This is the kind of work which, if played “straight,”
will die.Altinoglu caught the work’s
humor and shifted moods effortlessly, helped by pin-point turns by the
orchestra.
The character of Don Juan is more familiar: a rebellious
Spanish libertine or, in modern psychobabble, a sex addict. He also has a gambling problem and kills the
father of one of his conquests. Dude’s
got issues. As with Till Eulenspiegel,
Don Juan dies for his sins – but in this case the death is self-inflicted. Dark stuff indeed. But the tone poem
starts off with a brash major key fanfare, because pursuing and obtaining sex
is fun – at least in moderation. The fact that Don Juan is
rebelling against an overly strict father is icing on the cake. Just don’t fall in love or things will get complicated. Again, Altinoglu’s conception was a model of phrasing, pacing, and
clarity. The Cleveland Orchestra proved
once again that it retains its crown as a great orchestra for this kind of
repertoire, and special mention must be made of Nathaniel Silberschlag’s horn
solo which featured the most unearthly legato I’ve ever heard from that
instrument.
Daniel and I just returned from a five-day
vacation in Mexico, our fourth time in that country together. February is an ideal time to go to Mexico,
especially if you live in a climate like those of us in northeast Ohio. Also, as Cancún is
known as a spring break destination, by going in February you’re avoiding the
spring breakers – although we saw our share of drunken Americans. We chose Cancún as
our primary destination partly because we hadn’t been there before but mainly
because it was served by nonstop flights from two carriers: United and
Frontier. We’ve only flown Frontier once
before, a trip to Las Vegas in 2017 where we encountered no difficulties and
the flight was like a party. Many
travelers seem to dislike Frontier Airlines.
I think part of the discomfort some feel with Frontier is the DIY aspect
of doing business with them. Everything
is done via the app or the automated kiosk at the airport – including tagging
your own checked baggage. Aside from a
bit of lagginess with the app, we had no issues and since we were flying
internationally, we had to interact with a ticketing agent – who was very nice
and helped us resolve a very minor issue.
We awakened at 4am Wednesday the 11th and
drove to the airport. After checking our
bag and showing the ticketing agent our passport, we made it through TSA with
enough time to grab a quick breakfast and buy some bottled water before going
to the gate. This worked out well for us
because food and beverages cost extra onboard.
Our flight to Cancún was uneventful, but people baffle me - Cancún is
not the place to bring babies or toddlers, yet our flight had plenty of
them. The plane itself, an Airbus A321neo, was clean and functioned well,
but the cabin was designed for efficiency more than comfort. The seat backs did not recline, did not have
touch screens, nor were there chargers on board. You get what you pay for. If you can fit these factors into your
expectations, Frontier will work fine for you.
Frontier is known for its unique plane livery and the animal tail for our flight
down was Chopper, the Great White Shark.
(Our return flight featured Mitch the Wolverine.)
Once we landed at Cancún
International Airport, we breezed through border control, got our luggage,
and took the ADO bus
to the hotel zone. The bus dropped us off at Plaza
la Fiesta, and we grabbed a quick lunch on our way to our hotel of choice,
the InterContinental
Presidente resort, an IHG hotel. After multiple travel experiences
with Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, and Raddison, I’ve concluded that IHG simply
offers the best value for the money. Our
hotel room on the 5th floor was comfortable without being ostentatious.
The resort had three restaurants and a host of amenities. It also had
beachfront access although Dan & I aren’t especially beach oriented.
After settling in, we explored the hotel zone and stopped at Mextreme restaurant for drinks and a
small dinner. Later that evening, we took a taxi to a gay club in
downtown Cancún which was nearly empty and where the music was deafeningly
loud. There was another gay club nearby but they had a $20 cover charge and
nothing was happening there aside from a drag show and karaoke. Cancún is not Puerto Vallarta. So, we
called the same taxi driver - who had given us his phone number - and he swung
by to return us to our hotel. This time his young son was in the
passenger seat and I showed him photos of the snow in Ohio.
Enjoying a bit of nightlife.
We awakened fairly early Thursday morning and
had a fine breakfast which included beef tips and chilaquiles in the hotel’s beachside
restaurant buffet. This was Dan’s birthday and we had an open day to follow our
whims. We took the R2 bus
(12 pesos, about 70 cents per rider) to La
Isla mall.
Truthfully, there wasn’t much there that you
couldn’t find in any US mall. But we did ride the Ferris wheel which offered some
excellent views of the hotel zone. Then we went to the local cinema and
saw “Send Help,” which was presented in English with subtitles in
Español. This was one of those fancy theaters where they bring drinks and
snacks to you.
I gained a bit of weight in Mexico.
Friday the 13th was a lucky day for us and
featured a trip to Yucatán
including stops at Chichen
Itza - which gave us a sense of the pre-Conquistador history of the area, a
buffet lunch at La
Casona in the small town of Valladolid, and
the cenote of Oxman.
An interesting thing we learned is that many residents of this area are of
Mayan ancestry and their Español is heavily peppered with Mayan Yucatec words
and phrases. The late lunch we had in Valladolid was so generous that we didn’t
have room for dinner, although we had a small snack with drinks before turning
in for the night.
Chichen Itza
After the long trip to Yucatán Friday,
we stayed close to Cancún’s
hotel zone Saturday. We did have one excursion
out to the bay where we were able to see the underwater
ecosystem in a glass bottomed vessel. From there we walked to the Mayan
Museum of Cancún, which has the ruins of a small Mayan
village. The museum itself does not appear to be in very good
shape. This is something we’ve noticed in Cancún: parts are modern,
parts are charmingly rustic, and parts are in serious disrepair. We
walked to Plaza la Fiesta that evening for dinner at Casa Tequila and
some shopping at the Mexican outlet where we saw an extremely drunk American
guy struggling to remain standing.
Daniel outside the Mayan Museum.
Sunday was our last full day here. We
spent two hours on the beach. The sand here is so white and fine - and
the water amazingly clear. Then we returned to Mextreme for lunch and
drinks before a final walk around Plaza la Fiesta. They say that Cancún
is not the “real” Mexico, but we had an enjoyable time. Still, our next
visit to Mexico will likely take us elsewhere - perhaps Zipolite
in Oaxaca, or Mexico
City.
Our return trip to Mextreme.
We awakened early Monday morning for a quick
breakfast before checking out and heading to the airport. As we
waited in line to check our luggage, an announcement was made that Frontier’s
flight to Philadelphia had been canceled - eliciting a groan from some of those
in line. Meanwhile, an arrogant American bound for Cleveland was berating
the ticketing agent for something which was his own mistake. I always
feel the strong urge to speak up to bullies like this, but I held my
tongue. Soon we were checked in, through security, and at gate 53 in
terminal 4.
Our flight to Cleveland arrived early, but as
usual, US border patrol was a cluster of inefficiency. This has been a
sadly familiar experience, encountered every time we return to the United
States, whether at airports in Chicago, Dallas, Charlotte, or Cleveland.
A noteworthy contrast to our experiences with the efficient, friendly border
services we've witnessed in London, Barcelona, Puerto Vallarta, and
now Cancún. We retrieved Brownie from boarding around 5pm and were
soon home; unpacking, having dinner, relaxing, and planning our next trip.
One advantage of being old is that, as long as one maintains one's mental faculties, one has a long memory. I'm old enough to remember when the Mcdonald's on Mayfield Road in South Euclid (which has been rebuilt at least twice) featured signs on the outside proclaiming "CITY ORDINANCE - NO EATING IN CARS."
When I purchased my home on South Belvoir
Boulevard in 2008, there were four large oak trees on my property – two in the
front yard, one in the back yard, and one bordering my neighbor’s
property. Over the course of time, it became necessary to remove two of
these trees because of the danger they presented to our homes – in fact, a
large branch broke from the tree in the back yard and pierced through the roof
of my house’s extension, requiring an expensive repair. Removing large
trees is an expensive proposition. I can assure you that no homeowner
makes the decision lightly. The last thing we need is yet another
government commission looking over our shoulders.
City council was fine with this development at Queen Ann Court, which cut down numerous mature trees - which won't be replaced. But when it comes to removing trees on YOUR property, they want to make the decision for you.
My parents moved to South Euclid in
1971. From then until 1980 we lived on Queen Mary Drive. The
backyard of our house faced a wooded area. Since I moved back to South
Euclid in 2008, South Euclid has aggressively pursued developments of large
tracts of land, including Cutters Creek, Oakwood Commons, and more recently the
Queen Ann Court extension and now Trebisky Grove. These projects have and
will result in many large, mature trees being cut down – the vast majority of
which will never be replaced. The chief proponent of this new ordinance
has cited the environmental, infrastructural, and mental health benefits of
trees. I have no argument with that. My question is this: did the
proponent or any supporters of this ordinance support any of the developments
listed above? If so, then their advocacy of this ordinance reeks of
hypocrisy, because those developments cause far more damage to our environment
and strain on our local infrastructure than individual property owners will. I
find it bitterly ironic that City Council now wishes to regulate hard working, tax-paying
residents whose aim is merely to maintain their own property as they see
fit. South Euclid homeowners already struggle with some of the highest
property taxes in northeast Ohio. In the final analysis, it is the
property owner who is the best judge as to whether to maintain a tree on his
own property or remove it, not a city entity. South Euclid’s population
has dropped by some 27% since its peak in 1970. Don’t give those of us
who remain here another reason to leave.
This weekend’s Cleveland Orchestra concerts
featured guest conductor Antonello Manacorda along with the welcome return of
one of the greatest violinists of our time,Augustin
Hadelich. The orchestra is fresh from
its triumphant performances at Carnegie Hall, where they received rave
reviews.
The concert opened with Mendelssohn’s popular Violin
Concerto in E minor, Op. 64.This is a composition that balances Classical
rigor with Romantic expression, with all three movements linked via bridge
passages.Nearly every violinist of note
has performed and recorded this concerto. Having
heard Hadelich several times, I was looking forward to
his interpretation and was not disappointed.Violinist and orchestra delivered a performance which was intimate and
emphasized the work’s lyrical aspects.One highlight was in the central movement where Hadelich’s soaring lyricism
held the audience’s rapt attention.The
finale eschewed all shallow virtuosity while not sacrificing brilliance – it was
swift without sounding rushed.A
standing ovation was followed by an encore, a bluesy piece that was at once
familiar and unfamiliar.
Following intermission, Manacorda returned to
lead the orchestra in Schoenberg’s Chamber
Symphony No. 2.I’m
familiar with this work only through recordings and will confess that I have
not assimilated it enough to be able to comment on the performance except that the
work was delivered with an appropriate starkness.
The closing work was Schubert’s famed Symphony
No. 8 in B minor, D. 759, by Schubert – the so-called
“Unfinished” Symphony.Manacorda began
the work with stillness, as if it was arising from nothing, making this all too
familiar work a mystery once more.As
the introduction segued to the main theme, I was stuck once again by what an
unconventional opening movement this is.Manacorda is one of those rare musicians who understands the importance
of silence, and those moments of stillness served to make the movement’s turbulent
episodes all the more dramatic – even traumatic.For those who follow such matters, Manacorda
observed the repeat.The second movement
featured a relatively flowing tempo, with the melody in the high violins beautifully
floating over the strings.Again,
Manacorda took care to keep the orchestra at a true pianissimo when the score
indicated it.The concert ended in a
contemplative and serene mood – far removed from our stressful era.
By day: Cubicle drone. By night: Husband, uncle, Classical music enthusiast, pianist, blogger, dogwalker, home renovator, Trekker, good trouble-maker.
All entries on this blog, with the exception of embedded content from other sources, are the intellectual property of Hank Drake. Any reproduction or reprinting without written permission is strictly prohibited.
A note about my reviews: I neither seek nor accept compensation (either monetary or in the form of tickets or complimentary products) for my reviews. Thus, the reader can be sure the reviews, wherever I cross-post them, reflect my honest opinion, and are not slanted in order to curry favor or peddle influence.
PLEASE NOTE: I've received a large number of spam responses to my blog. All comments are moderated. Spam, profanity, and hate-speech will be automatically deleted. Threats will be reported to the authorities. Anonymous comments are generally not posted. I publish my blog under my own name. Have some guts and do the same in your comments.